Module 1: Professional Pedagogical Reflection on First Clinical

Module 1: Professional Pedagogical Reflection on First Clinical Experience and Call to Professional Commitment to Future Action

TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report  & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation

Review the materials in 

 Module 1: Learning Activities

REVIEW THE RUBRIC! Then 
consider your first teaching 
experience and your reflections and goal setting from Visions of Practice from you Field and Practicum I Course (
EDSN 682 Module 11) and from Observation Feedback (
EDSN 682 Module 8) . What were you able to plan and implement in your teaching to support student learning since completing EDSN 682?

Pinpoint 
two specific areas of strength (reinforcement) and two specific areas for improvement (refinement) related to your instruction and delivery skills. In other words, what do you do well, and what do you need to improve as related to your teaching? What do you want to know and be able to do from a pedagogical lens by the end of this course? (see 

Touro GSE Practicum Observation Rubric Domains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
).

You will have opportunities to demonstrate your growth and development throughout this course. You will also have opportunities to refer to these responses and revise them as you grow throughout the semester. This professional pedagogical response will also be used in your final paper “Looking Backward/Looking Forward”.

In your response,

· be thoughtful and thorough

· use 

academic languageLinks to an external site.

· state your ideas clearly and provide rationale for your responses by referencing previous course work, the Module 1 readings and the following 

Touro GSE CLOs
:

·
Professional Commitment to Action 

·
Discipline Knowledge and Skills

·
Equity and Access

Your response should be limited to 
no more than 500 words double spaced, typed (two pages).

TCAP Components #1:Classroom Report  & # 2:Professional Review, Self-Evaluation

Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response

Grading Rubric: Professional Pedagogical Response

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInsights into Teaching and Learning

3.4 pts

Level 3

3 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements.

3 pts

Level 2

2 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements.

2.6 pts

Level 1

1 take-aways are written clearly, concisely, and logically. The examples from reading, prior course work and practice (experience) are relevant and support the statements.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGoals for future practice (glow)

3.4 pts

Level 3

The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Using academic language or the language of the discipline clearly state your knowledge and understanding and provide rationale about your responses.

3 pts

Level 2

The 2 goals for the future practice (experience) are included. The 2 new areas for learning about teaching and student learning are identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing.

2.6 pts

Level 1

The 1 goal for the future practice (experience) is included. The 1 new area for learning about teaching and student learning is identified. Academic language and/or the language of the discipline and/or rationale about your responses is missing.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflexive Praxis RP1: Are aware of and reflect on their practice in light of educational research, professional ethics and resources available for professional learning EA RP1. Examine and are aware of how one’s biases, privilege, identity, and socio-cultural experiences influence teaching and learning

3.4 pts

Level 3

Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges to improve teaching and learning.

3 pts

Level 2

Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, social cultural experience, or privileges regarding teaching and learning.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Reflections demonstrate the examination of one’s biases, regarding teaching and learning.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Commitment to Action EA PCA1. Integrate theory and practice as related to diversity and global perspectives EA PCA3. Advocate for educational equity and justice through research, policy, and practice

3.4 pts

Level 3

1. Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, and professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students and their well- being (e.g., belonging, inclusive classroom and school cultures). 2. Candidate advocates for educational equity or social justice through research, policy, or practice.

3 pts

Level 2

Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Candidate demonstrates application of attitudes, knowledge, skills, or professional ethics that contribute to the academic success of students.

3.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Literacy and Research EA DLR3. Knowledgeable of ethical, moral, and culturally responsive research methods and practices

3.4 pts

Level 3

Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical research methods and culturally responsive and ethical use of research and data.

3 pts

Level 2

Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical and culturally responsive use of data or research.

2.6 pts

Level 1

Candidate demonstrates understanding of ethical or culturally responsive use of data or research

3.4 pts

Total Points: 17


Previous


Next

#Module #Professional #Pedagogical #Reflection #Clinical

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Written assignment. Imagine you are about to hire a new worker or

Written assignment. Imagine you are about to hire a new worker or workers for your organization.  Prepare an APA formatted 4-5 pages paper (with a minimum of six [6] peer-reviewed sources):   · Based on the information in this chapter (attached in the other file), what screening questions would you include

1. Top of Form Many people in the US, particularly the elderly, take

1. Top of Form Many people in the US, particularly the elderly, take more than one prescribed medication. CDC (2014) reported that between 2009 and 2012 nearly 48% of persons asked used at least one prescription drug, 22% used three or more prescription drugs, and nearly 11% used five or

For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words for each. Use in-text

For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words for each. Use in-text citations accordingly. Use scholarly reference(s). Use and cite references using APA 7th Style Guide accordingly. Don’t combine DQs together. Topic 1: Job/Task Analysis and Evaluation DQ 1) Aamodt (2022) in Industrial/Organizational Psychology: An Applied Approach discusses the importance of job analysis

Mini-Literature Review – Pt 1 Read the introduction of low-carbon

Mini-Literature Review – Pt 1 Read the introduction of low-carbon development opportunities using the abatement cost approach – Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC): Then, find five additional articles (i.e., peer-reviewed journal articles) related to your proposed topic.  (my proposed topic is to qualify or quantify the low-carbon development opportunities using

SCI 100 Module Six Activity Template: Science in the Real

SCI 100 Module Six Activity Template: Science in the Real World Instructions First, choose one video from the module resources to watch. You should use points made in the video you chose, and any other course resources, to support your responses to the questions below. Replace the bracketed text with

For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words for each. Use in-text

For each DQ elaborate within 260-300 words for each. Use in-text citations accordingly. Use scholarly reference(s). Use and cite references using APA 7th Style Guide accordingly. Don’t combine DQs together. Topic 1: Job/Task Analysis and Evaluation DQ 1) Aamodt (2022) in Industrial/Organizational Psychology: An Applied Approach discusses the importance of job analysis

Instructions: Due Tuesday 02/6 At least 3 paragraphs long with 3

Instructions: Due Tuesday 02/6 At least 3 paragraphs long with 3 peer-reviewed references. No textbook sources Explain the potential problem that could arise from using ROI as the incentive measure for managers. What are some specific actions a company might take to resolve this potential problem? #Instructions #Due #Tuesday #026At

Instructions: Due Tuesday 02/7 At least 3 paragraphs long with 3

Instructions: Due Tuesday 02/7 At least 3 paragraphs long with 3 peer-reviewed references. No textbook sources What does the direct materials quantity variance measure? Who is generally responsible for the direct materials quantity variance? Describe two situations that could result in a favorable direct materials quantity variance. Describe two situations

Chapter 4 Do you believe the media should be censored to protect

Chapter 4 Do you believe the media should be censored to protect Homeland Security? What if the news media got a hold of sensitive information as it pertained to an investigation into a potential terror attack and, by releasing that information to the public, it could hinder and prevent the

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTIES (NONPF)

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTIES (NONPF) COMPETENCIES The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that app #NATIONAL #ORGANIZATION #NURSE #PRACTITIONER #FACULTIES #NONPF

Short Paper We all have to eat, but there is a lot of

Short Paper We all have to eat, but there is a lot of controversy surrounding what is good to eat. Use peer-reviewed, scholarly articles to answer the question, “What is the best diet?”. Write a summary of your research in 500 words and cite and reference at least four articles(